All posts by Eric Robert Nolan

Eric Robert Nolan graduated from Mary Washington College in 1994 with a Bachelor of Science in Psychology. He spent several years a news reporter and editorial writer for the Culpeper Star Exponent in Culpeper, Virginia. His work has also appeared on the front pages of numerous newspapers in Virginia, including The Free Lance – Star and The Daily Progress. Eric entered the field of philanthropy in 1996, as a grant writer for nonprofit healthcare organizations. Eric’s poetry has been featured by Dead Beats Literary Blog, Dagda Publishing, The International War Veterans’ Poetry Archive, and elsewhere. His poetry will also be published by Illumen Magazine in its Spring 2014 issue.

Blogging my only review of a “Doctor Who” episode. Because I’m a masochist.

And I enjoy the sheer antipathy that is inevitably inspired by any criticism of this show (or, God forbid, actor David Tennant).

No, seriously — I actually really liked the horrorish episode, “Blink,” with the weeping angels.  I’m running this for my old friend David Bozic, who, it turns out, is another devoted “Whovian.”

Here’s the review I did on Facebook maybe two years ago:

*****

Doctor Who generally isn’t my thing.  But I have friends who are really diehard … “Whovians?”  Is that what they call themselves? And Alex Tirado-Snyder finally talked me into watching a particularly good episode – Season 3’s “Blink.”

I wasn’t disappointed.  This is actually a great little horror story, and you can enjoy it even if you’re unacquainted with the bizarre (and poorly delineated, in my opinion) rules for this unique sci-fi universe.  It honestly reminds me of something that Stephen King might have written, albeit for a general tv audience.  I was genuinely creeped out by the story’s adversaries, which I won’t describe because of spoilers.  The repeated line of “Don’t blink!” along with the episode’s closing shots, were nice and frightening.

It’s also a damned cool time-travel story – if you’re patient and pay attention, you’ll see that it works.  Carey Mulligan is a really good actress in a lead guest role, and parts of the story (featuring characters displaced in time) are pretty poignant.  I’m not sure this episode really merits its Hugo Award, but it was still a good watch.  I’d recommend it.  Thanks, Alex.

It’s easy to see why this widely venerated show has such a devoted fanbase.  It’s fun and quirky and smart.  Still, I can’t say that this franchise is quite my thing.  I feel the same why about this as I do about Joss Whedon’s work.  I know it’s well made, but it’s too high-camp for me.  Also … I can’t explain this, but David Tennant just gets on my nerves.  I remember being turned off by him in his role in 2011’s “Fright Night” remake.  I don’t know why … is he too chipper?  Too manic?  Is there an androgynous quality about him that I find unsettling?  There’s something about him that suggests an overeager British schoolboy that won’t shut up and just won’t leave you alone.  Whatever.  I’m sure the problem is me.  He’s a very good actor, and of course he’s well suited for this role.

Postscript: I had a lot of fun with this story because it brought back something from my childhood.  In the long ago pre-internet days when I was 11 years old, the kids on the street would huddle under Jason Huhn’s porch on summer nights and tell ghost stories.  I made up a monster a little like the one in this story, and it scared my best friend Shawn because I portrayed him as the victim.  He tried to make me stop telling the story, but the other kids insisted I continue.  He got pretty agitated.  So I was kind of a jerk when I was a kid, too, sort of.

doctorwhoblink

Nobody reads my review of “24’s” past season.

But my review of a Disney princess film that came out seven years ago gets 27 Facebook shares.

You people mystify me.

Learn Everything

Yes, I actually watched this. (A review of “Enchanted.”)

Because while I have a love of horror movies, I also have high school friends with small children.

She REFUSES to let me show her three girls the whimsical magic of “Donnie Darko,” even though that film is clearly appropriate for children.  (It has a talking rabbit.)  So the five of us watched 2007’s “Enchanted,” and I liked it a lot.  Because the laughter of little girls can be infectious after a long day.

If you’re an adult, you can have good fun watching Disney lampoon its own cliches, all the while avoiding them — the gently spurned would-be stepmother here, for example, isn’t “wicked.”  The fish-out-of water humor of a Disney princess inhabiting the “real world” is accessible to adults.  And Susan Sarandon is a pleasure to watch in any film — I actually never realized before what a great voice she has until I heard it connected with her animated equivalent here.  (The movie is bookended by animated segments.)

You can also have great fun trying to recognize the genteel characters as actors you’ve seen in other movies.  The bubbly, clueless princess here is none other than the reserved, highly intelligent Lois Lane in “Man of Steel” (Amy Adams).  I spent the whole film trying to figure out who the prince is, until I realized it was Cyclops without his visor (James Marsden).  And the character of Nathaniel is none other than Timothy Spall, who every film fan will recognize as Thomas Tipp from the priceless “Vanilla Sky.”  Spall is also in another group of movies … apparently there is this really popular film franchise about a boy wizard?  (It might be based on a book series.)

Seriously, this is a fun, safe movie for small children that you can also enjoy with them.

Since the girls liked this so much, I am going to screen “Terminator 2: Judgement Day” for them if my friend lets me babysit.  That’s a fun, fish-out-of-water story with a strong female protagonist too.

Enchanted

“Overcoming Obstacles” is the theme for Dagda’s Publishing’s latest charity poetry competition.

The deadline is October 20th; funds support Myton Hospice and Dementia UK.

Click here for details:

http://dagdapublishing.co.uk/2014/08/25/competition-time-enter-charity-overcoming-obstacles-poetry-competition/

What can I say about “24: Live Another Day?” Not much actually …

… because for a surprise-heavy show like this, just about anything you say could be a spoiler.  Even the overriding plot arc for the second six episodes (it’s a 12-ep. limited series) results from a major plot twist.

So, the less said, the better.  This was a good, strong miniseries, though — I’d rate it at 8 out of 10.  Die-hard fans like me actually like to think of it wistfully as Season 9, as that would suggest the show can be resurrected.  (Can it?  I’ve read some confusing things about whether we will see Jack Bauer again, either on the big screen or on tv.)

At first, Day 9 gets off to a slow start.  I even worried that it wouldn’t live up to my expectations.  It seems like a loose, unstructured jumble of narratives that confusingly inform us that Chloe is now a bad guy, along with Jack.  (And it would be great if they could explain to new and returning viewers a little more about Jack’s ostensible fall from grace at the end of Season 8; that was four years ago, and I have a narrow attention span.)

The script spends too little time letting viewers identify with the most imperiled protagonist — the hapless American technician wrongly implicated in treason and murder.  (I don’t even remember his name.)  It’s a nightmarish scenario, especially in the age of The Patriot Act, and it could have done more to pull the viewer in.  But we spend too much time on less intense subplots like President James Heller’s (William Devane) advancing Alzheimer’s disease, and Audrey’s (Kim Raver) lackluster marriage.

These are more like story arcs for a Lifetime movie-of-the-week, and not “24.”  It’s great when everyday human drama underscores the main thriller narrative of “24” by being intertwined with it — that’s something that makes “24” so damn cool, although few people realize it.  But here, at the start, the main plotline faltered while the softer stuff seemed to take center stage.

But then things pick up — we’re rewarded with all of the action, pathos, intrigue, quick pacing, great villains and unexpected twists that made “24” the best thriller on television.  It has a uniformly strong cast.  Kiefer Sutherland is as badass as ever, even if he is approaching 50.  And even he is outshined at times by Devane.  That guy is positively magnetic.  I’ll bet Devane has never given a poor performance in any movie, ever.  He was so likable and believable as a president that I wanted to vote for him — really.  Yvonne Strahovski was a surprise stand-out as Chick-Jack (she even has blond hair!), and the script does a good job suggesting she might become his successor.  So, too, was Michael Wincott as Adrian Cross — that guy is terrific.  “Day 9” ultimately lives up to the high standards set by past seasons.

One final quibble — just as with “The X Files,” this show, in its ninth year, begins to show strong evidence of recycled plotlines.  The sadder twists, which sometimes seemed shoehorned in to depress longtime viewers, are things that we have definitely seen in past seasons.  I really want to say more, but … spoilers.

o-24-LIVE-ANOTHER-DAY-facebook

“The Joy of Horror Novelizations,” by Grady Hendrix, Litreactor

Here’s a fun article over at Litreactor — thanks to Dagda Publishing for the link:

http://litreactor.com/columns/the-joy-of-horror-novelizations

I actually DO remember reading the novelization of “ET” The Extra-Terrestrial” as a pre-teen … and it DID have a lot of sexual content. The book for “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom,” as I recall, was quite good.

“Videodrome,” starring that guy who looks like me, NEEDED a novelization so that at least 10 percent of it could be made intelligible.

I almost commented on Dagda’s Facebook wall yesterday that I loved the novelization of “Jaws,” because I am an idjit — of course it was the original Peter Benchley novel.

This is a good article, but it does neglect to mention comic book adaptations of movies — I remember going NUTS for both Marvel Comics’ “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and “Return of the Jedi” in comic book format.  “Raiders” was a nice, thick one-shot — about as long as a DC Comics “Sgt. Rock” annual.  Receiving that from my parents at the age of 12 was like Christmas morning.  “Jedi” was less memorable, and was broken up into four parts — I had more fun with the trading cards.

RaidersComic1

images raiderscomics

mss18b

I think I’m a day late with this?

(This is the guy who forgets every year when Easter is.)  Have a happy Autumnal Equinox.

Don’t party too hard, lest you start acting Equinoxious.

10710726_1554044851474010_7018914563339512736_n

“AAAHH!!! FLYING ELVES ARE BACK!!”

As so many people enjoyed the link that I posted yesterday to MST3K’s “Last Clear Chance,” here is second greatest short film ever lampooned by the show.

Enjoy “Hired,” parts one and two.

“Ya got a nice office, Boss.”

Henry Holiday’s “Dante and Beatrice” (1883)

640px-Dante_and_beatrice