Tag Archives: Eric Robert Nolan

A spoiler-free review of the “Sherlock” Christmas special (2016).

What can I say about the “Sherlock” Christmas special, “The Abominable Bride?”  Extremely little, for fear of spoilers.

I will say that I loved it — I’d rate it a perfect 10, as I would just about any episode of this amazing TV show.  Also, as good as the trailer was … I can say that it offers much more in its story than you’d expect.

I’d also say that it strongly, strongly parallels a movie that I happen to love — right down to its surprise plot device, key character interactions, and a symbolic act by the main protagonist in the climactic scene.  The similarities are just too much for this to be a coincidence — it’s just got to be a well done (and a damn fun) homage.  It’s unexpected, too, as the film I’m thinking off probably appeals to a different fan base.  “The Abominable Bride” also cheerfully skewers another excellent recent film and the twist employed there.  [My blog posts link automatically to Facebook.  If you see this via my page, then PLEASE do not name the movies you think I’m talking about.]

There’s some terrific acting, especially between Sherlock (Benedict Cumberbatch) and our main villain.  And the dialogue is as sly and superbly delivered as always.  I don’t think I’ve ever watched a new episode of “Sherlock” and not laughed out loud at least once.  The stronger, more assertive John Watson (Martin Freeman) that we see is damn terrific.  (There’s a compelling and sensible reason why this iteration of Watson seems a little different than our usual mild anti-hero, but I just can’t say why.)

My quibbles were wholly forgivable.  I thought that the Victorian versions of Molly Hooper (Louise Brealey) and Mycroft Holmes (Mark Gatiss) were just so cartoonish that they seemed right out of a “Saturday Night Live” sketch.  It “took me out of the movie,” and hampered my willing suspension of disbelief.  It felt more like farce and silly sight-gags, instead of the dry, dialogue- and character-driven humor that the show is known for.

I also though that the climactic scene occurring among three primary characters, felt a little … off.  Was it just not staged right?  Was the pacing off?  Maybe I got the sense that I was looking at a soundstage?  I’m not sure.

Finally, I am an inveterate horror movie fan, and I might have liked to have seen the director and screenwriters play up the horror story elements just a little bit more here.  The mystery for this episode was a jewel of an opportunity — a garish, fearsome “ghost bride” that assassinates men.  It could have been just a little scarier, given that story.  I know that “Sherlock” is not a horror show, but its creators did just fine in making their adaptation of “The Hound of the Baskervilles” both a bit frightening and a proper mystery.

But, again, those are just forgivable quibbles.  This show remains the best thing on television!

[Update: there’s a direct reference to “The Five Orange Pips,” but we see little parallel with the story shown.]

 

sherlock_abominable_bride_poster_portrait

“Rough men stand ready in the night …”

This is just a quick word of thanks to the police and military professionals who’ve kept us safe this holiday season.  If it’s anything that recent events have shown us, it’s that your bravery and professionalism are needed now more than ever.

Godspeed, and thank you for your service.

 

sku-gt85

It’s Nolan’s ROCKIN’ New Year’s Eve!!

Starring ME!  MYSELF!  AND I!  The spirits of my deceased ancestors!  The painting behind me!  Which I myself would not have selected!! (Sorry, Mom.)  Ben!  And Jerry!!  Or, rather, their eponymous product!!  Nirvana, via my playlist!!  Whatever godforsaken animal that is at the house across the street that is howling so grotesquely!!  (It’s either one of those new “coywolves,” or a depressed Lycan, or a wounded goddam Hound of the Baskervilles; I’m not sure.  You kinda don’t expect that in New York.)

My trip home was arranged on the fly; I didn’t contact a single high school friend.  This is the fruit of my lack of foresight.

I might just resurrect my childhood imaginary friend Kachoual.  He was a Bengal tiger, and goddam huge.  I’d be less wigged out about the geographically incongruous hellhound I’m hearing.

Oh, well — four minutes!  Happy New Year!!!

WIN_20151231_23_41_48_Pro

 

 

 

Wishing you the best of things to come.

Friends near and far, I wish you a Happy New Year!  I hope that 2016 brings you peace, safety, love and wonder.

The picture below is “New Year’s Eve Foxfires at the Changing Tree, Oji,” by Utagawa Hiroshige.  It’s part of his “One Hundred Famous Views of Edo,” a series of prints completed between 1856 and 1859.  I’m unfamiliar with the mythology connected with it, but it depicts foxes breathing fire at Shōzoku Inari Shrine (site of the Changing Tree) in Ōji, Tokyo.

It’s quite beautiful, and tonight it just felt right.  This is a contemplative New Year’s Eve for me, as I’ve been haunting my childhood neighborhood after visiting family in New York.  And I described for my mother at length how beautiful was the fox I found playing along the stream I so often pass down in Virginia.

 

Hiroshige,_New_Year's_Eve_foxfires_at_the_changing_tree,_Oji,_1857

 

A quick review of “Containment” (2015)

“Containment” (2015) is the film that sounds cliche but isn’t.  It’s a surprisingly fresh take on an old standby — diverse people isolated by an outside threat are forced to cope and survive with each other, along with the threat.  In this case, an entire apartment block in Britain is forcibly and mysteriously quarantined overnight; residents awaken to sealed doors and hazardous materials units being deployed along the grounds.

But this is a smartly written independent sci-fi thriller that avoids a lot of common tropes.  Then it introduces plot developments that are unexpected, yet make perfect sense.  It’s more original than you’d guess at first.

There’s a lot of nice acting, including work by Lee Ross, and by Louise Brealey of “Sherlock” (2010) fame.  And all those moody establishing shots of the tomb-quiet building were creepily effective.

My only complaint was a thematically ambiguous ending that seemed lost on me.  But I’d still give this an 8 out of 10.

 

91vJl5zT1XL._SL1500_

Today’s thoughts:

Rainy days make New York an occasionally rude London.

If I develop dyslexia at 43, that makes me 34 years old.

Reading glasses make me look responsible.  That makes them an effective disguise.  So Clark Kent had it right all along.

Chicken pot pies are damned good.  Is it weird if I am vocal about that?

I really ought to finish my Christmas shopping.  Tonight, definitely.

That one dude in “Star Wars” looks like Oscar Wilde.  Seriously.

 

WIN_20151028_17_08_03_Pro

My spoiler-free review of “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” (2015)

This review of “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” will be necessarily brief, for fear of spoilers.  And when I say “fear of spoilers,” I really do mean FEAR of spoilers.  There are people out there who will burn your house down if you ruin this long-awaited film’s surprises.

I really liked it.  I would somewhat grudgingly give it a 9 out of 10, as I can’t match the sheer ardor of its global legions of fans.  (Yes, “Star Wars” was a big part of my childhood, but I have more or less gotten over it.  I read last night, for example, that filmmaker Kevin Smith actually cried upon stepping aboard the Millennium Falcon when he visited the set; I am not quite as nostalgic as that.)

In short, it absolutely succeeds as a fun space fantasy, and recaptures the spirit of the original “Holy Trilogy.”  It easily surpasses the much-maligned prequels on nearly every level, including screenwriting, acting and special effects.  The predominance of practical effects over those that are exclusively digital make this movie’s universe feel “real” and “lived in.”

We finally have relatable characters again who sound real, and who can invite viewer sympathy.  The dramatic interaction among our newer heroes and returning icons is both logical and emotionally involving.  I was surprised at how well this movie handled the passing of the torch.  It was a kind of skilled storytelling that was almost entirely absent from the last three films.  And the special effects were top notch.

My only mild quibbles might reflect a greater degree of objectivity that you might hear from someone who is not a raging fan of the series.  This film so closely parallels the original “Star Wars” (1977) that at times it started to feel like a remake.  Were the similarities in structure, characters, plot points, planets and villains all an intentional homage?  I suggest that our bad guys here, for example, sometimes feel interchangeable with those of past “Star Wars” films.  I want to say more, but can’t, because of spoilers.  Am I the only person who noticed these things?

I also submit that, like a few other “Star Wars” movies, our characters are rendered with little depth, with sparse information about their skills, motivations, backgrounds or ideosyncrasies.  The dialogue is thin.  Consider lines like “He’s my friend!” and “Because it’s the right thing to do.”   And we are presented with no information about why the speaker here is so noble, when others are not.  Even if the screenwriting here is better than the prequels, it’s still not Tennessee Williams.

It’s all very forgivable, I guess, just so long as the viewer remembers that they’re sitting down to an installment in a film franchise originally intended for young people.  It’s kid stuff.  It’s really, really good kid stuff, but it’s kid stuff.  (Don’t burn my house down!)

And the reason I chose a 9 rating instead of an 8 was primarily the enjoyment I got from seeing familiar faces.  The return of our icons was surprisingly well depicted and, if you loved “Star Wars” as a kid, then that should be enough to make this a “must-see” movie.

 

Latest-The-Force-Awakens-Trailer-Description

 

Union Station, Washington, DC, December 23, 2015

Union Station has long been synonymous in my mind with sunny days and warm nights.  It was a frequent destination in my 20’s, when I visited various Mary Washington College alumni for reunions of one kind or another.

The last of those arches you see to the left of 2015’s Christmas tree was my “smoking spot” after disembarking from an Amtrak train.  The spaces out front would occasionally serve as a staging area for a party weekend, as Sanjeev Malhotra would pick me up, then ready himself for several days in which he would endeavor, with varying degrees of success, to keep me out of trouble.

I was always used to seeing the Capitol Dome shine upon my arrival like a vast, upright egg; it was an image in a poem or two I scribbled down to commemorate my adventures.

Things were different Wednesday.  2015’s strangely mild new winter wasn’t quite cold, but it was blustery, cool, a little wet and quite gray.  That is indeed the Capitol Dome that you see in the third photo, but I discovered it darkened and under renovation.  And that slate sky’s color differed little from the dark monument marble you see in the foreground.  I need to spend a day in DC after a kinder climate finds it, I think.

I like the shot I got of that woman feeding the pigeons.

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAOLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAOLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAOLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

A short review of “The Hallow” (2015)

I wanted to love “The Hallow” (2015) more than I did.  It has all of the attributes of a film that I’d love.  It’s a creatively conceived, independent horror film, beautifully shot on location in the forests of Ireland.  It portrays a family under attack in a gorgeously scenic isolated location at night.  It’s got highly original story antagonists — grotesque monsters who seem birthed from Irish folklore and science fiction both.  They’re rendered quite nicely with some great special visual and sound effects, and are truly frightening.

Yet, at times, my attention wandered.  I’m not sure why.  Maybe it was because the pacing was way off, maybe it was the story’s bland parent-protagonists.  Maybe it was because the modus operandi for the monsters was confusing at first.  I get the sense that “The Hallow” might have been more enjoyable had it been just slightly shorter.

It was still good, though.  I’d give it a 7 out of 10.

If you do watch it, then continue to watch through the credits.  There’s a really neat coda that adds a new and interesting level to the story.

 

The-Hallow-poster

Merry Christmas!

To all those who celebrate — MERRY CHRISTMAS!  I hope the day has found you with joy, peace, love and happiness!

Pictured: Cover to December 1913 issue of “Boy’s Life” Magazine, “Santa and Scouts in Snow,” by Norman Rockwell.

1913-12-Boys-Life-Norman-Rockwell-cover-Santa-and-Scouts-in-Snow-400