“Boreas,” by John William Waterhouse, 1903

Boreas

Photo credit: John William Waterhouse [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.

“The robbed that smiles steals something from the thief.”

“To mourn a mischief that is past and gone
“Is the next way to draw new mischief on.
“What cannot be preserved when fortune takes,
“Patience her injury a mock’ry makes.
“The robbed that smiles steals something from the thief,
“He robs himself that spends a bootless grief.”

 

—  from William Shakespeare’s “Othello”

 

othello-bill

Uh … is this really the best way to protect children from Internet predators? Seriously.

Check out the video linked below, in which a local FOX affiliate films parents and an Internet prankster teaching adolescent girls about online predators.

I’m going to go ahead and express what I am certain is the minority opinion here. Of COURSE I agree with the goal of protecting children from Internet predators. But is this the best way to do it? Just think about it. What we have here is an elaborate, staged situation that could traumatize a child, which is THEN BROADCAST and is PERMANENTLY ACCESSIBLE via the Internet. I don’t care if the girls’ faces are blurred — I’m willing to bet that their classmates, neighbors and extended family members know exactly who they are. And now there is a documented public spectacle that could follow them throughout their lives.  (And any other Internet user could easily blog it, tag it, or link to it with the girl’s name.)

This is at least a bizarre manner of teaching children, and at most potentially harmful. I can’t imagine that something like this could be condoned by any child psychologist, or very many professional educators.  Who comes up with these ideas?  The Internet prankster, Coby Persin, whose modus operandi is impersonating adolescent boys?  The parents?  Parents can be idiots.  It’s why so many children can be idiots.  (I have schoolteacher friends.)

[EDIT: I should not have named Persin as a “professional” prankster or “consultant” in an earlier draft of this blog post — it implied that he is paid for his services.  Persin’s Youtube account is set up to receive donations and has paid advertising, but I don’t see any evidence that he was paid by the girls’ parents.]

I generally think it is a very bad idea for parents to broadcast footage of them disciplining their children. It just seems … simple-minded, and maybe even (consciously or unconsciously) a bid for attention by the parents.

But, hey — I’m no expert. Correct me if I’m wrong.

I actually DO know exactly how to protect oneself from the movies’ “Predator.” You cover yourself with mud so that he cannot see you via his infra-red vision; then attack with with non-metal weapons, as Arnold Schwarzenegger did in 1987.  I don’t have kids, but if I were raising adolescent girl, we probably WOULD re-enact that film. Any girl of mine would be raised to be the next Ellen Ripley or Sarah Connor.

FOX 12 Oregon: “Social Media Dangers”

predator_01

“I begin to feel like most Americans don’t understand the First Amendment …”

“I begin to feel like most Americans don’t understand the First Amendment, don’t understand the idea of freedom of speech, and don’t understand that it’s the responsibility of the citizen to speak out.”

— Roger Ebert

Roger_Ebert_crop_(retouched)

Photo credit: “Roger Ebert crop (retouched)” by The original uploader was Rebert at English Wikipedia – File:Roger Ebert (extract) by Roger Ebert.jpg, File:Russ Meyer and Roger Ebert by Roger Ebert.jpg. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio’s “David and Goliath,” 1599

David_and_Goliath_by_Caravaggio

Photo credit: Caravaggio [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

John William Waterhouse’s “The Lady of Shalott Looking at Lancelot,” 1894

The_Lady_of_Shallot_Looking_at_Lancelot

John William Waterhouse [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

“Fear the Walking Dead,” but Crave the Next Episode!

The pilot of AMC’s prequel to its little known zombie tv show was just great!  I’d give it a 9 out of 10.

It looks as though “Fear the Walking Dead” will be a smartly scripted horror drama with relatable, realistic, three-dimensional characters — something I think “The Walking Dead” has often stumbled with.  (Other fans strongly disagree, of course.)  The cast was quite good across the board — but especially Frank Dillane, whose performance as a heroin addict with tragic recognition was just outstanding.   And “Fear” shows fans of the zombie horror sub-genre exactly what the vast majority of movies fail to examine — what happens when an epidemic is in its infancy.  No, there are none of the zombie “swarms” that are the bane of Rick Grimes and company, but the “slow burn” horror here delivers nicely.

I am on board with this.

Hey … when Dillane’s addict character starts screaming at the character of “Gloria” in the abandoned church, am I the only one who started humming Laura Branigan’s “Gloria?”

fear2

“Francis Turner,” from Edgar Lee Masters’ “Spoon River Anthology”

“Francis Turner”
 

I COULD not run or play
In boyhood.
In manhood I could only sip the cup,
Not drink—
For scarlet-fever left my heart diseased.
Yet I lie here
Soothed by a secret none but Mary knows:
There is a garden of acacia,
Catalpa trees, and arbors sweet with vines—
There on that afternoon in June
By Mary’s side—
Kissing her with my soul upon my lips
It suddenly took flight.

 

bb872c92e4c6bc7ae1f34101c6b83b00

My take on the ambiguous ending for John Carpenter’s “The Thing.” (Major spoilers.)

John Carpenter’s 1982 tour-de-force, “The Thing,” is arguably the best horror movie of the decade.  It paid little attention to the movie it ostensibly remakes, the standard, boilerplate, flying-saucer Saturday-matinee of “The Thing From Another World” (1951). It presumably paid greater attention to its real and far darker source material, “Who Goes There?,” John W. Campbell Jr.’s 1938 horror-sci-fi novella.

One of the things the movie’s fans still debate heatedly is its bleak ending — I think it goes beyond ambiguous to downright mysterious.  Viewers actually are given no certainty whatsoever about who or what are actually pictured onscreen in the film’s Antarctic setting, after a fiery climax for this gory, special-effects-heavy actioner.  (Only people who have seen the film know what I am talking about.)

My own interpretation is a little less popular than the others you hear about.  To conceal spoilers, I’m sharing it after the poster image below.  [IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE MOVIE, STOP READING NOW!]

movie-poster-the-thing

Continue reading My take on the ambiguous ending for John Carpenter’s “The Thing.” (Major spoilers.)

NICE WORK.

11012475_998985520164726_4010849576029157433_n

Nurse Your Favorite Heresies in Whispers