Tag Archives: Eric Robert Nolan

My review of “[REC] 3: Genesis”

I’m blogging some of the movie reviews I’ve done in the past on Facebook.

Please don’t let this somewhat negative review dissuade you from watching the first two films in the [REC]” franchise — they were fantastic.  And, in retrospect, maybe my rundown here was a little too critical.  This could be a fun and campy throwaway horror film.

*****

“[REC]: 3: Genesis” was a disappointingly average entry into an otherwise fantastic series of Spanish horror films.  The first two “[REC]” movies were among the scariest I’ve ever seen, and maybe even more frightening than “The Exorcist.”  But the third simply has little in common with its predecessors, and deserves a 4 out of 10 at best.

Gone is the deadly serious story, the found-footage style, the kinetic action and shadowy setting.  This movie inexplicably abandons everything that put Spain on the map for modern zombie cinema.

This is a campy horror-comedy with more than a little slapstick and goofy setups – almost like an entry into “The Evil Dead” franchise.  Even the infected “zombies” seem like very different monsters here and, compared with the first two films, we actually see less of them.   The supernatural nature of the virus – a minor story annoyance “[REC]” and “[REC] 2” – was more prominent here, to the movie’s detriment.  Who the hell made all these creative decisions?!

Parts were even disjointed and confusing.  (And I’m not alone here – one glance at the imdb.com message boards shows that there were many, many people disappointed with this movie – which looked incredible it its trailers.)

The movie was partially redeemed by a new and creative setting, and an intense and unexpected ending.  (Wow.)

But let’s hope the planned “[REC] 4: Apocalypse” sees fruition and is a return to form.

file_168391_0_REC-3-Genesis-Poster

Blogging my only review of a “Doctor Who” episode. Because I’m a masochist.

And I enjoy the sheer antipathy that is inevitably inspired by any criticism of this show (or, God forbid, actor David Tennant).

No, seriously — I actually really liked the horrorish episode, “Blink,” with the weeping angels.  I’m running this for my old friend David Bozic, who, it turns out, is another devoted “Whovian.”

Here’s the review I did on Facebook maybe two years ago:

*****

Doctor Who generally isn’t my thing.  But I have friends who are really diehard … “Whovians?”  Is that what they call themselves? And Alex Tirado-Snyder finally talked me into watching a particularly good episode – Season 3’s “Blink.”

I wasn’t disappointed.  This is actually a great little horror story, and you can enjoy it even if you’re unacquainted with the bizarre (and poorly delineated, in my opinion) rules for this unique sci-fi universe.  It honestly reminds me of something that Stephen King might have written, albeit for a general tv audience.  I was genuinely creeped out by the story’s adversaries, which I won’t describe because of spoilers.  The repeated line of “Don’t blink!” along with the episode’s closing shots, were nice and frightening.

It’s also a damned cool time-travel story – if you’re patient and pay attention, you’ll see that it works.  Carey Mulligan is a really good actress in a lead guest role, and parts of the story (featuring characters displaced in time) are pretty poignant.  I’m not sure this episode really merits its Hugo Award, but it was still a good watch.  I’d recommend it.  Thanks, Alex.

It’s easy to see why this widely venerated show has such a devoted fanbase.  It’s fun and quirky and smart.  Still, I can’t say that this franchise is quite my thing.  I feel the same why about this as I do about Joss Whedon’s work.  I know it’s well made, but it’s too high-camp for me.  Also … I can’t explain this, but David Tennant just gets on my nerves.  I remember being turned off by him in his role in 2011’s “Fright Night” remake.  I don’t know why … is he too chipper?  Too manic?  Is there an androgynous quality about him that I find unsettling?  There’s something about him that suggests an overeager British schoolboy that won’t shut up and just won’t leave you alone.  Whatever.  I’m sure the problem is me.  He’s a very good actor, and of course he’s well suited for this role.

Postscript: I had a lot of fun with this story because it brought back something from my childhood.  In the long ago pre-internet days when I was 11 years old, the kids on the street would huddle under Jason Huhn’s porch on summer nights and tell ghost stories.  I made up a monster a little like the one in this story, and it scared my best friend Shawn because I portrayed him as the victim.  He tried to make me stop telling the story, but the other kids insisted I continue.  He got pretty agitated.  So I was kind of a jerk when I was a kid, too, sort of.

doctorwhoblink

Nobody reads my review of “24’s” past season.

But my review of a Disney princess film that came out seven years ago gets 27 Facebook shares.

You people mystify me.

“The Joy of Horror Novelizations,” by Grady Hendrix, Litreactor

Here’s a fun article over at Litreactor — thanks to Dagda Publishing for the link:

http://litreactor.com/columns/the-joy-of-horror-novelizations

I actually DO remember reading the novelization of “ET” The Extra-Terrestrial” as a pre-teen … and it DID have a lot of sexual content. The book for “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom,” as I recall, was quite good.

“Videodrome,” starring that guy who looks like me, NEEDED a novelization so that at least 10 percent of it could be made intelligible.

I almost commented on Dagda’s Facebook wall yesterday that I loved the novelization of “Jaws,” because I am an idjit — of course it was the original Peter Benchley novel.

This is a good article, but it does neglect to mention comic book adaptations of movies — I remember going NUTS for both Marvel Comics’ “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and “Return of the Jedi” in comic book format.  “Raiders” was a nice, thick one-shot — about as long as a DC Comics “Sgt. Rock” annual.  Receiving that from my parents at the age of 12 was like Christmas morning.  “Jedi” was less memorable, and was broken up into four parts — I had more fun with the trading cards.

RaidersComic1

images raiderscomics

mss18b

My initial review of “The Signal” (2014) was going to be two sentences:

“WTF did I just watch?  YOUR GUESS IS AS GOOD AS MINE.”

Reflection does suggest a few more things for me to say for this challenging sci-fi thriller, even if I did need a little subsequent help from Wikipedia to understand it.

It is beautifully shot and scored, and has strong performances from all of its actors.  It does just great at establishing mood, and setting up an unsettling mystery.  And it is good, old fashioned, hard-core science fiction.

I DO think it runs a bit long, and has big pacing problems.  Simply put, this film is too slow to be scary.  So it fails as a horror movie or thriller.  There is insufficient exposition about what is going on, even for an intentional “mind-bending” movie in the tradition of films like “12 Monkeys” (1995).  Can we really be scared or affected if we have so little understanding of what is actually happening onscreen?

I STILL have questions.  Why does the facility appear to have technology only from the 1970’s or 1980’s?  Why is one character homicidal?  Why are alarms going off?!

Still, it was interesting, challenging, and lovely to look at.  It’s worth a look, if you want a darker, demanding film that makes you think.

Anyway, there actually is another recent science-fiction thriller entitled “The Signal.”  It was made in 2007, and should please fans of well made formula films like “The Crazies” or “Dawn of the Dead.”  I actually enjoyed that low-budget genre film more than I enjoyed this.

MV5BMTA2MDc5MDQ2MTVeQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU4MDY4Njc3NDEx._V1_SX640_SY720_

Paranoid fear of the day —

— that now Uwe Boll will challenge me to a boxing match.

Oh well.  If it happens, then at last I can finally invoke the phrase (and in context!) “Come at me, Bro!”

“Seagull,” by Eric Robert Nolan

“Seagull,” by Eric Robert Nolan

(First publsihed in Dead Snakes, November 2013)

Like an awkward emperor,
you sit alone atop
the rooftop of my urbane neighbors.

Squat and fat and white, you’re
a satisfied and unenlightened despot.
Edicts issue out
From your discordant “caw!”

What do those yuppies think of you?
Your mien makes
Their rich art-deco house
A commonplace kingdom.
Your ungainly gait makes
a prosaic palace of their home.

Cardinals arcing over
are airborne scarlet darts.

Pairs of swallows will sometimes
loop in symmetry.

You’ll have none of it. You’re
All utilitarian flight
And graceless landings.

If you were human
you’d be a pot-bellied plumber, perhaps
in a wife-beater t-shirt
holding a beer.

Other birds will swoop and dive.
Other birds will sing.
But your cawing only exhorts us,
“Hail to The King.”

© Eric Robert Nolan 2013

http://deadsnakes.blogspot.com/2013/11/eric-robert-nolan-three-poems.html

640px-Laridae_in_Beijing_Zoo

“Feast,” by Eric Robert Nolan

“Feast”

Originally published on October 16, 2013, by Every Day Poets.

http://www.everydaypoets.com/feast-by-eric-robert-nolan-2/

This give me a few IDEAS …

… and, whaddya know … a few of my friends just happen to be ACTORS.

Russ, Linsee … care to stop over sometime?

10624894_813646905352570_2525687786259601184_n

“After Sept. 11, a 62-year-old poem by Auden drew new attention. Not all of it was favorable.”

Linking here to a great article in 2001 by Peter Steinfels at the New York Times, discussing the renewed popularity of W.H. Auden’s “September 1, 1939” after 9/11.

I knew the poem was controversial, and that it arguably could have been quoted out of context, as it references the events preceding World War II.  But I had no idea how controversial.  I can’t believe the famous piece was later so “loathed” by Auden himself.

Here is a link to the poem itself, at the website of Academy of American Poets:

http://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/september-1-1939