The deadline is October 20th; funds support Myton Hospice and Dementia UK.
Click here for details:
The deadline is October 20th; funds support Myton Hospice and Dementia UK.
Click here for details:
… because for a surprise-heavy show like this, just about anything you say could be a spoiler. Even the overriding plot arc for the second six episodes (it’s a 12-ep. limited series) results from a major plot twist.
So, the less said, the better. This was a good, strong miniseries, though — I’d rate it at 8 out of 10. Die-hard fans like me actually like to think of it wistfully as Season 9, as that would suggest the show can be resurrected. (Can it? I’ve read some confusing things about whether we will see Jack Bauer again, either on the big screen or on tv.)
At first, Day 9 gets off to a slow start. I even worried that it wouldn’t live up to my expectations. It seems like a loose, unstructured jumble of narratives that confusingly inform us that Chloe is now a bad guy, along with Jack. (And it would be great if they could explain to new and returning viewers a little more about Jack’s ostensible fall from grace at the end of Season 8; that was four years ago, and I have a narrow attention span.)
The script spends too little time letting viewers identify with the most imperiled protagonist — the hapless American technician wrongly implicated in treason and murder. (I don’t even remember his name.) It’s a nightmarish scenario, especially in the age of The Patriot Act, and it could have done more to pull the viewer in. But we spend too much time on less intense subplots like President James Heller’s (William Devane) advancing Alzheimer’s disease, and Audrey’s (Kim Raver) lackluster marriage.
These are more like story arcs for a Lifetime movie-of-the-week, and not “24.” It’s great when everyday human drama underscores the main thriller narrative of “24” by being intertwined with it — that’s something that makes “24” so damn cool, although few people realize it. But here, at the start, the main plotline faltered while the softer stuff seemed to take center stage.
But then things pick up — we’re rewarded with all of the action, pathos, intrigue, quick pacing, great villains and unexpected twists that made “24” the best thriller on television. It has a uniformly strong cast. Kiefer Sutherland is as badass as ever, even if he is approaching 50. And even he is outshined at times by Devane. That guy is positively magnetic. I’ll bet Devane has never given a poor performance in any movie, ever. He was so likable and believable as a president that I wanted to vote for him — really. Yvonne Strahovski was a surprise stand-out as Chick-Jack (she even has blond hair!), and the script does a good job suggesting she might become his successor. So, too, was Michael Wincott as Adrian Cross — that guy is terrific. “Day 9” ultimately lives up to the high standards set by past seasons.
One final quibble — just as with “The X Files,” this show, in its ninth year, begins to show strong evidence of recycled plotlines. The sadder twists, which sometimes seemed shoehorned in to depress longtime viewers, are things that we have definitely seen in past seasons. I really want to say more, but … spoilers.
Here’s a fun article over at Litreactor — thanks to Dagda Publishing for the link:
http://litreactor.com/columns/the-joy-of-horror-novelizations
I actually DO remember reading the novelization of “ET” The Extra-Terrestrial” as a pre-teen … and it DID have a lot of sexual content. The book for “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom,” as I recall, was quite good.
“Videodrome,” starring that guy who looks like me, NEEDED a novelization so that at least 10 percent of it could be made intelligible.
I almost commented on Dagda’s Facebook wall yesterday that I loved the novelization of “Jaws,” because I am an idjit — of course it was the original Peter Benchley novel.
This is a good article, but it does neglect to mention comic book adaptations of movies — I remember going NUTS for both Marvel Comics’ “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and “Return of the Jedi” in comic book format. “Raiders” was a nice, thick one-shot — about as long as a DC Comics “Sgt. Rock” annual. Receiving that from my parents at the age of 12 was like Christmas morning. “Jedi” was less memorable, and was broken up into four parts — I had more fun with the trading cards.
As so many people enjoyed the link that I posted yesterday to MST3K’s “Last Clear Chance,” here is second greatest short film ever lampooned by the show.
Enjoy “Hired,” parts one and two.
“Ya got a nice office, Boss.”
One gaze points elsewhere, Prospero,
My compass is my own;
Nostalgic sailors do not know
The waters where Antonio
Sails on and on alone.
— Antonio, from W. H. Auden’s “The Sea and the Mirror”
My Girl Friday just texted me to express the concern that a friend of ours is “donuting on his own.”
I myself am inclined to respect his privacy. That thing about going blind is just an old wives’ tale.
Mystery Science Theater 3000’s “Last Clear Chance.” Arguably the funniest 20 minutes of footage ever recorded.
I demand that you watch this. Now.
“All right, let’s listen.” “OKAY, NOW STOP.”
“WTF did I just watch? YOUR GUESS IS AS GOOD AS MINE.”
Reflection does suggest a few more things for me to say for this challenging sci-fi thriller, even if I did need a little subsequent help from Wikipedia to understand it.
It is beautifully shot and scored, and has strong performances from all of its actors. It does just great at establishing mood, and setting up an unsettling mystery. And it is good, old fashioned, hard-core science fiction.
I DO think it runs a bit long, and has big pacing problems. Simply put, this film is too slow to be scary. So it fails as a horror movie or thriller. There is insufficient exposition about what is going on, even for an intentional “mind-bending” movie in the tradition of films like “12 Monkeys” (1995). Can we really be scared or affected if we have so little understanding of what is actually happening onscreen?
I STILL have questions. Why does the facility appear to have technology only from the 1970’s or 1980’s? Why is one character homicidal? Why are alarms going off?!
Still, it was interesting, challenging, and lovely to look at. It’s worth a look, if you want a darker, demanding film that makes you think.
Anyway, there actually is another recent science-fiction thriller entitled “The Signal.” It was made in 2007, and should please fans of well made formula films like “The Crazies” or “Dawn of the Dead.” I actually enjoyed that low-budget genre film more than I enjoyed this.