My review of “Escape From Alcatraz” (1979)

I’m blogging some of my past movie reviews; please don’t hate me for not giving the classic film more love.

*****

“Escape From Alcatraz” (1979) was a decent flick; I’d give it a 7 out of 10.   (And, yeah, I do know I’m going to get nailed to the wall by my film buff friends who no doubt can point out reasons why it would deserve a higher rating.  This is why I hide behind an internet connection with these reviews.)

Clint Eastwood really is a wonderful actor, and there are nice amounts of tension here.  I personally think the best actor was Roberts Blossom as “Doc.”  I was also pretty surprised to discover just how much “The Shawshank Redemption” (1994) borrowed from this – right down to an elderly, eccentric  prisoner nurturing a pet and dying tragically.

To me, the movie seemed a little thin.  Of the four protagonists, the only one we really get to know is “Butts,” and two others are convenient Italian American stereotypes.  Little was done to exploit Patrick McGoohan’s amazing acting skills as the warden.  (This was the guy who played Longshanks in “Braveheart” (1995)!!)

It also seems thinly plotted.   Little transpires beyond four prisoners gathering small objects to effect their escape.  And if you’ve already read about the true story of Frank Norris, there are no surprises here.  Finally, we do not even fully see the aftermath of the story for the one unfortunate conspirator.

This movie also might suffer from … “genre fatigue?”  Yes, it’s regarded as a classic, but, since 1979, we’ve seen fictional film prisons do more with this kind of setting.  One, of course, is the obviously inspired “Shawshank.”  Another is HBO’s “Oz.”   I just don’t think this movie would thrill a modern audience the way it did in 1979.

MV5BMjY4ODYxOTYyOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNzczNjQxMTE@._V1_SX640_SY720_

october

October Horror fans

HAPPY_OCTOBER_by_EvilApple513

happy-october-5

“Vocation,” by W. H. Auden

Part XII of “The Quest”

Vocation

Incredulous, he stared at the amused
Official writing down his name among
Those whose request to suffer was refused.

The pen ceased scratching: though he came too late
To join the martyrs, there was still a place
Among the tempters for a caustic tongue

To test the resolution of the young
With tales of the small failings of the great,
And shame the eager with ironic praise.

Though mirrors might be hateful for a while,
Women and books would teach his middle age
The fencing wit of an informal style,
To keep the silences at bay and cage
His pacing manias in a worldly smile.

Skip this “Elevator” and catch the next one.

“Elevator” (2011) started strong and then just flzzled.  It had a few strong moments, but the ending lacked much punch or surprise, and it finally had the feel of a made-fpr-tv movie.  I’d give it a 4 out of 10.

This movie also suffers from the inevitable comparison with surprisingly fantastic “Devil” (2010) an elevator-themed thriller that was ten times better than its synopsis makes it sound.

Elevator Box Art (2-D)

As if Benedict Cumberbatch weren’t cool enough already …

… his reading of John Keats’ “Ode To A Nightingale” is goddam phenomenal.

Seriously.  Listen to it.  It’s the first piece featured in the below BBC America article, “10 British Actors Read 10 British Poems,” which was sent along to me by a close friend. (October 2nd was National Poetry Day in England.)

If you became a fan of Cumberbatch, as I did, because of his role as the (ostensibly) detached “Sherlock,” it can seem strange hearing him do such an emotional reading here.

http://www.bbcamerica.com/anglophenia/2014/10/world-poetry-day-10-british-actors-read-10-british-poems/

My review of “The Divide,” (2012)

I was surprised indeed by “The Divide” (2012) – a flawed post-apocalyptic  horror film that nevertheless has a hell of a lot going for it.  It’s a horrifying, brutal look at seven apartment building residents who survive a nuclear holocaust by sheltering together in the building’s basement.

Does that sound dark?  Because it’s a hell of a lot darker than you think it is.  This film is brutal and disturbing – even by the standards of the survival-horror sub-genre.

The script is flawed, but this movie still surprised me and held me in suspense.   You know it’s a worthwhile movie if you can’t stop watching it, even if the screenwriting isn’t perfect.  That’s partly due to a great cast – with terrific performances by Michael Biehn, Courtney Vance, Lauren German, Milo Ventimiglia,  Ashton Holmes, Rosanna Arquette and Ivan Gonzalez.

Despite the good acting all around, the runaway performance was Michael Eklund as Bobby.  This guy is an incredibly talented actor.  He nailed the role of a survivor who descends quickly into madness and depravity, and was probably the best thing about this movie.  His performance actually reminded me a hell of a lot of Buffalo Bill in “Silence of the Lambs.”  That kid was amazing and terrifying.  (I don’t think what I’m writing here is a spoiler; everyone knows the premise of the movie, and Bobby is recognized almost immediately as an erratic personality.)

This movie reminded me just a little of the superb BBC docudrama, “Threads” (1984), which was an equally brutal look at the aftermath of a nuclear war – far more so than the inferior American “The Day After,” which made headlines a year earlier.  (And doesn’t everyone in my age bracket remember that?)

The special effects budget is limited.  But the final shot of the movie is fantastic.

Again … this is not a feel-good film, even when compared with other movies like this.  This movie was written by people who have absolutely no faith in human nature.  The final choice by one character is pretty sad evidence of that.  What the character does seems inexplicable at first, but then makes perfect sense when you think about it.  And it’s pretty depressing.

I’d give this movie an 8 out of 10.

The_Divide_Poster

Are you excited that Episode VII is being made?!?!

Me: “Are you excited that Episode VII is being made?!?!”

Amanda: “What?”

Me: “I GUESS NOT.”

Then she comments that she can’t really get into Star Wars because she hasn’t read the original books upon which they are based.

GIRLS.

-e83ffa5f-e8d1-44ac-846b-7bf48bcfeff8

castannounce-1536x864-183587080566

Illustration of the Devil, from the Codex Giga (13th Century)

—  Herman the Recluse of the Benedictine monastery of Podlažicehttp://www.kb.se/codex-gigas/eng/Br

Codex_Gigas_devil

Devil_codex_Gigas

My review of “The Dark Knight Rises” (2012)

Blogging some of my past movie reviews — this is my take on “The Dark Knight Rises.”  Warning — fanboy bubbling ahead.

*****

Dear Lord, “The Dark Knight Rises” (2012) was fantastic.  This third and final installment to Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy, at several times, wanted to make me stand up and cheer.

This film deserves a perfect 10.  All of the magic of “Batman Begins” (2005) and “The Dark Knight” (2008) return – especially with respect to an excellent script with a layered, detailed plot and great, three-dimensional characters.  I found myself seeing parallels between this movie and another current popular comic book adaptation, AMC’s “The Walking Dead.”  Both seem to have expertly taken the best elements from the comics, but then also changed or updated the source material to enhance it and surprise longtime fans.  And there’s a great continuity with the preceding films in terms of characters, themes, motif and story.

The dialogue was wonderful; this is a quotable movie.  And the basic story is perfect, especially in the way this film was challenged to follow up the amazing “Dark Knight.”  They made some wise choices.  Instead of trying to match Heath Ledger’s performance as The Joker, Nolan simply presents us with a new kind of “Bat-villain” — Bane, a supremely logical and ordered personality whose background seems very similar to Bruce Wayne’s.  I was a Batman comic book fan in the early 1990’s, when Bane was created.  He remains one of my all-time favorite villains, along with Randall Flagg, Two-Face, (Matt Wagner’s) Grendel, and Hannibal Lecter.  Nolan seized the compelling original character (created, I believe, by writer Chuck Dixon), and truly capitalized on it.

So too, did Nolan capitalize on the great character of Selina Kyle as Catwoman (again best characterized in the original comic by Dixon).  She was wonderfully played by a runaway performance by Anne Hathaway, and she really does deserve her own movie.

The acting was wonderful all around (even though Tom Hardy doubtlessly was challenged as an actor by a mask that obscured his face).  Hathaway, was a terrific surprise, and Gary Oldman and Michael Caine were awesome as always.  Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Marion Cotillard did just great in their supporting roles, especially with some character aspects and choices that viewers might not have expected.  I’ve criticized Christian Bale’s acting in the past … but here I thought he was at his best in the trilogy.

By the end of the movie, the two quibbles I had were extremely minor.  One, we see various supporting characters use high-tech military vehicles that would seem to require at least some training.  (You and I cannot simply hop into a tank and know how to use it.)

Two, by the end of the movie, Bane is not quite the iconic character I remember from the comics.  He seemed upstaged by certain other characters.  But I’m a nerd, and Bane is a favorite, so … really?  There’s probably no pleasing me, anyway.

Seriously, though, THANK YOU CHRISTOPHER NOLAN.

the-dark-knight-trilogy-hd-wallpapers

“JIGGY JAR JAR DOO.”

Oh, Dear God.

Bad Lip Reading made a full song and music video out of “Carl Poppa,” and it is brilliant.

“WORDSMITH.  RHYMES.”

Nurse Your Favorite Heresies in Whispers