Tag Archives: Season 2

“The … Stalking Dead?” (A review of “Daredevil” S2E1)

[THIS REVIEW CONTAINS ONE SPOILER.]  So the fantastic John Bernthal is now the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s “Punisher,” debuting (however briefly) in the first episode of Netflix’ “Daredevil” Season 2.  I just know that there is a great “Walking Dead” joke hiding around here somewhere; but I can’t seem to put my finger on it …  (Something about … Blind Grimes?  Disabled Rick?  Daredevil can’t see “stuff?”  Or “thangs?”)  You people work that out for me.

Bernthal’s arrival is dream casting, every bit as perfect as bagging the inimitable Robert Downey, Jr. as the MCU’s Iron Man.  Even though the actor speaks only a single word, it’s goddam beautiful.

That’s one of the better things about Season 2’s first outing, which, for me, fell into the category of “good, but not great.”  (I’d still give it an 8 out of 10, and I feel certain the season will get better.)  What we see in S2E1 is mostly setup.  The episode clearly tried to introduce tension by grooming the Punisher as a frightening antagonist, with limited success.  Even casual Marvel fans know that Frank Castle is a good guy, and nothing close to a Big Bad.  Yes, he’s an anti-hero who fatally shoots villains, and will be a foil for Matt Murdock’s Boy Scout restraint (as he was in the comics, back in the day).

But I doubt that the Punisher can be made scary or truly tension-inducing.  (Are we afraid of Wolverine?)  We know that his shoot-em-up tactics won’t leave Daredevil dead.  (This isn’t “Game of Thrones” or TWD.)  And I’d guess that most viewers, like me, aren’t too emotionally invested in this show’s minor characters.  (The only exception would be the quite interesting and three-dimensional Karen Page, still wonderfully portrayed by Deborah Ann Woll.)  Hell, I think the show would be better if the painfully annoying Foggy Nelson were made an early casualty.  Finally, if the show stays true to the original comics, then the Punisher has that most sympathetic of “origin stories” — a murdered nuclear family.

Both the Punisher and Bernthal have such devoted fanbases that a lot of viewers will probably root for him against Matt.  (Our very own Blog Correspondent Len Ornstein, for example, was known for firmly being on “Team Shane” for TWD.)  Looking back at my fervent comic-collecting days in the 1990’s, I seem to recall the Punisher having a far bigger fan following.  He was a mercenary and Vietnam veteran who simply shot up whatever corner of the Marvel Comics universe to which his quarry had tried in vain to escape.  Fans compared him to DC Comics’ iconic cash cow, Batman.  Matt Murdock, on the other hand, had niche appeal.  He was a liberal superhero if there ever was one — a Columbia-educated defense attorney who employed nonfatal force, and who fought for the “everyday man on the street.”  He was like a grownup, thoughtful, socially conscious Spider-Man.  If ever there was a comic book hero who would join the American Civil Liberties Union, it was Daredevil.

Moving forward, I think that Netflix will need an altogether different adversary than Castle to raise the stakes emotionally, and bring suspense to its second season.  Maybe the show will accomplish that with Elektra, who we know will also appear.  (And fans of the comics know that this integral character has far greater implications for our hero.)

The new season’s inaugural episode might have been slightly better if it had been tweaked elsewhere, as well.  Much ominous language is devoted to characterizing the Punisher as a killer with military proficiency.  We kinda don’t see that.  The largest action set piece shows no precision or professionalism, just a room full of gangsters being hosed down by gunfire from an offscreen shooter.  And while the sequence itself was dramatic, it seemed like something that could have been perpetrated by a (very well armed) street gang in a drive-by shooting.

We also see some of the dialogue problems that were so evident in the first season — as superb as the screenwriters are, they don’t do casual conversation among friends very well.  There’s the same forced banter and an embarrassing lack of chemistry among the three lead protagonists, this time on display during an awkwardly staged after-work barroom pool game.  (It’s particularly puzzling because Woll and Charlie Cox are both very good actors.)  This show scripts its villains, petty crooks and adversaries with such flair — why does it seem to fail so often with friendly conversation?  And why bother with these strange attempts at Scooby-Gang camaraderie in the first place?  I think it’s a weird creative choice.  These are serious characters leading serious lives.  It seems implausible to me that they should be so frequently upbeat anyway.

Hey — if I’m nitpicking a lot here, it’s only because I love the show, and consequently hold it to a very high standard.  It really is the best superhero adaptation on television.  My review of last season was absolutely glowing, and I honestly think that Season 2 will be just as good.  If you haven’t checked out “Daredevil” yet, you ought to.

 

 

12525571_1720957711473798_4489177249886597130_o

NEqq4plcdvfusz_3_b

 

 

A review of Season 2 of “The Strain”

When I favorably reviewed the first season of “The Strain” (2104) last year, I predicted that the show couldn’t sustain its momentum much longer, as the creepy effectiveness of its vampires was already beginning to fade.  I was pleasantly proven wrong.  Season 2 was a creepy, devilishly surprising ride, despite its silliness, and I’d rate it an 8 out of 10.

Let’s get a little killjoy pedanticism out of the way first.  “The Strain” has absolutely not lived up to its promise as an epic horror-movie-meets-technothriller, as suggested by the opening episodes of Season 1.  Those episodes looked like a collaboration between Bram Stoker and Tom Clancy.  Imagine how amazing this show could have been!

What we’ve got instead is more EC Comics horror than intelligent horror.  You’ll enjoy the program more the less that you think it through.  I can’t resist being a know-it-all here and deflating one of my favorite shows with some pretty big things it overlooks.

First, the vampire legions we see laying siege to New York City here are nothing less than invading force.  New York is the financial capitol of the United States, and arguably the world.  Its fall would cripple not only America, but also the world’s economy, and that’s not even considering the more obvious threat of the vampires extending their forces outward from there.

I think that Congress would repeal The Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits America’s armed forces from occupying U.S. lands.  (Or the president could easily circumvent it.)  We would see large standing armies surrounding and then moving in to New York, with support from the Navy and Air Force.  It absolutely would not just be outnumbered national guardsmen, heroic everyday policemen, and plucky, average New Yorkers rallying together, even if those things are fun to think about.  I think our armies would have plenty of international support as well.

Second, if our vampire forces (and their human collaborators) had any sense at all, they’d try hard to spread their contagion anywhere in the United States, even if they don’t intend to invade beyond New York.  Creating wildfire epidemics anywhere else on the continent would confuse and slow America’s response.

But I’m overthinking things.  “The Strain” is silliness, but it’s sublimely fun silliness.  This show didn’t fail to surprise and entertain me, and from time to time it creeped me out too.  I jumped a few times.  It indeed remains scary, with story devices that were spooky and damned creative.  One such device is the new breed of … what I call the “spider-vampires.”  They’re a different and even more unsettling threat than the baddies we’re used to.  And I can’t say much without spoilers, but the manner of their creation is pure genius horror writing.  Yeesh.  There are other little plot-related or character-related goodies that I’m thinking of, but I can’t specify without spoiling them.

Richard Sammel and Jonathon Hyde still lead the cast in talent; this is definitely a tv show in which the bad guys are the better thespians.  (For a show where Holocaust flashbacks have become stale, Sammel shines especially in fangless flashback that unexpectedly humanizes him.)  Their performances were often good enough to make me overlook the humdrum character of our often boring good guys.

Again, “The Strain” isn’t high art.  But it can be a damn fun time for a horror fan.  Check it out.

season-2-poster-2

My review of “The X Files,” Season 2.

After a shaky Season 1, the second season of “The X Files” showed it coming into its own and becoming the classic sci-fi horror show that I remember. I’d give it a 9 out of 10.

The program got scarier, tighter, and better directed. David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson settled into their roles, and became the unique characters fan loved, and their trademark dry banter and sexual tension finally appeared. The overarching plotlines and themes also more or less really made their first appearance in Season 2. The conspiracy and “The Project” finally take shape, with characters like Alex Krycek, The Well Manicured Man and Bill Mulder becoming part of the story, and the sadness and sense of tragedy that pervaded the series became a part of most of the show’s episodes – even the standalone monster-of-the-week episodes.

There were really only four misfires — “Little Green Men,” “3,” “Firewalker” and “Fearful Symmetry” were weak. The rest of the season was quite good.

Some of the eps, like “F. Emasculata,” “Aubrey,” “Irresistible,” and “Our Town” were genuinely scary. Just about any fan of the show will name the hilarious “Humbug” as a classic. And the mythology episodes, while not always frightening, were at least great sci-fi thrillers – especially the fantastic and perfect classic eps, “Colony” and “Endgame.”

Great stuff.

The_X-Files_Season_2

My review of “The Walking Dead” Season 2.

I am blogging my past TV reviews from Facebook; this was my (probably too kind) assessment of “The Walking Dead’s” problematic second season.  (I have since actually suggested to newcomers to the show that they skip this season entirely.)

*********

I want to love “The Walking Dead’.” I really do. It actually IS a very good show, and it brings one of my favorite horror subgenres into the mainstream. When I was in high school and college, fans of post-apocalyptic zombie horror were a relatively small group. Even if you liked horror films, most people leaned toward different kinds of movies. And the books and films that zombie fans enjoyed sort of petered out after the 1980’s. It just wasn’t a big thing.

And “The Walking Dead” has a lot going for it. (Through Netflix streaming, I was just able to catch up on the second season.) Can anyone name a show on cable television today that has more pathos? This show pushes the boundaries. I’ve often been surprised at what gets past the censors.

It’s got an expansive scope, a great basic story, and one extremely interesting character. (I don’t even need to say who it is – he started out as a supporting character and a plot device for creating tension within the group, and his popularity has soared past any other character.) This show probably also has the greatest makeup special effects of any television show I’ve ever seen. Yes, “The X-Files” occasionally gave us great monsters like “Flukeman,” but that was only for a single episode. “The Walking Dead” gives us visually terrifying adversaries every time we tune in.

But this show is also problematic. The pacing problems are enormous. Let’s look at the structure of every episode. It begins with an enjoyable pre-credit “hook” – something to reel us in. It usually ends with a bit of a cliffhanger – a brief action segment or dramatic event that’s a hell of a lot of fun. But between those two things … ugh. Sometimes the show seems like a boring soap opera that is bookended by brief zombie horror sequences. Really. What does it say about a show if you sometimes just fast-forward through all the conversations just to get to “the good parts?”

Oh well. I still like it a hell of a lot. This show always keeps me coming back, and I’m eagerly awaiting Season 3 on October 14. I’d give the second season an 8 out of 10.

013132524796b_{2d03b046-65ab-e111-8724-5296b839ed91}

Just a few quick thoughts on “Sherlock” Season 2.

The second season of “Sherlock” deserves a 10 out of 10, as the first did. (These “seasons” are really just a trio of feature-length made-for-tv movies.) It has the same fantastic writing, and great acting by Benedict Cumberbatch, along with all the great nods to the original books and stories.

It even gets better, with a logically expanding story that covers the detective’s rise (and fall) as a celebrity, and his final confrontation with James Moriarity, wonderfully played by Andrew Scott. This is one of the best tv shows I’ve ever seen. It’s got all of the flair of a great literary adaptation, with the tension of a procedural thriller like “CSI” or “24.” Amazing stuff.

91qt73QkZqL._SL1500_